Beliefs in Action: Economic Philosophy and Social Change by Eduardo Giannetti Da Fonseca

By Eduardo Giannetti Da Fonseca

This booklet is worried with the function of financial philosophy ("ideas") within the procedures of belief-formation and social switch. Its target is to additional our knowing of the habit of the person fiscal agent by way of bringing to mild and reading the functionality of non-rational tendencies and motivations ("passions") within the selection of the agent's ideals and ambitions. Drawing at the paintings of David Hume and Adam Smith, the publication spells out the actual ways that the passions come to impact our traditional knowing and behavior in functional affairs and the intergenerational and interpersonal transmission of principles via language. crisis with those difficulties, it really is argued, lies on the center of an enormous culture within the British ethical philosophy. This emphasis at the non-rational nature of our belief-fixation mechanisms has very important implications: it is helping to elucidate and qualify the deceptive claims frequently made through utilitarian, Marxist, Keynesian, and neo-liberal financial philosophers, all of whom pressure the overriding energy of rules to form behavior, coverage, and associations.

Show description

Read Online or Download Beliefs in Action: Economic Philosophy and Social Change PDF

Similar economic history books

Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America

The 1st completely sociological inquiry into the increase of company capitalism i do know of, and the main trenchant critique of the present 'efficiency theorists' we're prone to have for it slow. The booklet abounds with attractive insights into the rocky and hugely contingent heritage of the commercial company, heavily argued and intensely good documented.

Farm to Factory: A Reinterpretation of the Soviet Industrial Revolution

To claim that history's maximum fiscal experiment--Soviet communism--was additionally its maximum fiscal failure is to assert what many give some thought to noticeable. the following, in a startling reinterpretation, Robert Allen argues that the USSR was once the most profitable constructing economies of the 20 th century. He reaches this provocative end through recalculating nationwide intake and utilizing fiscal, demographic, and desktop simulation types to handle the "what if" questions crucial to Soviet historical past.

A History of Marxian Economics, Volume II: 1929-1990

The 1st quantity of this severe historical past covers the social, political, and theoretical forces at the back of the advance of Marxian economics from Marx's dying in 1883 until eventually 1929, the yr marking the onset of Stalin's "revolution from above," which for this reason reworked the Soviet Union right into a sleek superpower.

Extra resources for Beliefs in Action: Economic Philosophy and Social Change

Sample text

11 As d'Holbach were to put it, following closely (and eloquently) in La Mettrie's footsteps, 'had man fairly studied himself, everything should convince him that during every moment of his life he is but a passive instrument in the hands of necessity': [Man's] birth depends on causes entirely outside of his power; it is without his permission that he enters this system where he has a place; and without his consent that, from the moment of his birth to the day of his death, he is continually modified by causes that influence his machine in spite of his will, modify his being, and alter his conduct.

Similarly, in the Wealth of Nations, Smith had argued: (a) that the single most important factor accounting for the economic prosperity and the 'progress of opulence' in civilized nations, viz. the division of labour and the associated process of technical change, had been the 'result of human action, but not the execution of any human design': This division of labour, from which so many advantages are derived, is not originally the effect of any human wisdom, which foresees and intends that general opulence to which it gives occasion.

The very early Marx - 'human selfconsciousness [is] the highest divinity' - warmly supported the Epicurean standpoint and defended it from its ancient and modern detractors. For it was through the hypothesis of the swerving of the atom from the straight line, he held, that Epicurus had in effect provided a much needed loophole for human autonomy within the materialist camp. 3 The scientific achievements of seventeenth-century physics, which were partly inspired by a revival of interest in early Greek atomism and Epicurean philosophy, obviously did much to encourage increasingly sophisticated attempts to explain human action without having recourse to the supposed beliefs, desires, intentions and moral judgements of the agents.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.83 of 5 – based on 10 votes